91. In order to process any RFCP it is important to provide as much information as possible.

92. Changes to Volume 4 should outline the key elements of the proposed change(s), references to associated documentation and description of perceived technology trend (if appropriate). Changes should only be proposed in areas where a technology is gaining a broad market acceptance and mature product base.

93. For Volume 3 requests for new standards will address details such as a full specification title, description of applicability, and reference to a Web address or other source. Changes to, or deletion, of existing component standards will require appropriate support justification.

94. Under normal circumstances, changes to Volume 2 will have already been reflected in Volume 3, for example a standard possibly proposed as maturing from 'emerging' to 'mandatory'.

95. Rationale for changes must be adequately supported with implementation evidence in order to allow the review process to proceed.